Develop Your Strengths or Fix Your Weaknesses?
Image courtesy of Popoever
Gary Vaynerchuk, blogger and creator of Wine Library TV, had a fantastic (and short) video on his personal blog yesterday titled “I suck!”
Gary spends the first 60 seconds rattling off a list of things he’s horrible at, and then begins to explain how instead of dwelling on what he’s bad at, he’s instead chosen to work his butt off doing things he’s good at.
In HR, we spend a lot of time looking at both strengths and growth areas. There’s an emerging school of thought which argues that our time would be better spend enhancing and further developing an individuals strengths rather than focusing on fixing their weaknesses.
The argument is that if someone is not naturally good at something, they will at best be mediocre at it. And while you’re spending all of your time fixing things they’re not really all that good at, they don’t take full advantage of their existing strengths. I think there may be something to that. I’m not sure you should ignore all weaknesses, though.
I’d like to open this up for reader discussion. What’s your take: Grow strengths, improve weaknesses, or both?
Subscribe for Free Updates
Sign up to have new articles delivered straight to your inbox or RSS reader for free. You’ll also get a free copy of my ebook, Pushing Performance, a step-by-step guide to driving individual and organizational performance. |
Subscribe: RSS | Email |
Interesting points. Although I think improving oneself to at least be mediocre at something is better than being terrible at it. I do think that it is not worth spending hours on end trying to fix something. There are certainly less time consuming ways you can strengthen a weakness using online guides, tutorials, or watching an expert when possible. Just some thoughts.
November 20, 2008 | 9:44 am